Warning: Illegal string offset 'j' in /home/index689/public_html/snippets/newsformatter.core.php on line 80

Warning: Illegal string offset 'g' in /home/index689/public_html/snippets/newsformatter.core.php on line 80

Warning: Illegal string offset 'k' in /home/index689/public_html/snippets/newsformatter.core.php on line 82

Warning: Illegal string offset 'i' in /home/index689/public_html/snippets/newsformatter.core.php on line 82

Hot Issues
spacer
Australia’s $4bn Super blackhole impacting self-employed most
spacer
The proper help can be a benefit - age pension
spacer
SMSFs on ATO’s radar in cryptocurrency review
spacer
Limited recourse borrowing arrangements - LRBAs
spacer
What a financial planner does to help.
spacer
Goodbye to ad-hoc portfolios
spacer
Wanted: More voluntary super contributions
spacer
Australia by the numbers – May Update
spacer
Federal Budget 2019 - Overview
spacer
How the 2019 Federal Budget affects you
spacer
The problem with getting to 53 years of age.
spacer
Paying for health care in retirement
spacer
Personal super contributions and the 10% test
spacer
What investors can expect as key moves affecting markets await
spacer
ATO flags PAYG obligations for SMSFs with legacy pensions
spacer
Don't just plan for retirement; Plan for your life
spacer
Consumers misunderstand types of advice
spacer
Budget Time - How's Australia going?
spacer
When super isn't compulsory
spacer
Investors brace for Brexit - deal or no deal
spacer
ATO identifies SMSF contravention red flags
spacer
Extra website resources and tools is one way we offer you and your family more.
spacer
Tax and estate planning traps flagged with pension restructures
spacer
A checklist for a healthy financial year
spacer
High-risk LRBAs, TBAR on the ATO’s radar this year
spacer
All you need to know about how Australia is going.
spacer
Royal Commission report makes super fee recommendations
spacer
Four tips for boosting your super balance
spacer
New Year resolutions, New Year strategies
Article archive
spacer
January-2019
spacer
October-2018
spacer
July-2018
spacer
April-2018
spacer
January-2018
spacer
October-2017
spacer
July-2017
spacer
April-2017
spacer
January-2017
spacer
October-2016
spacer
July-2016
spacer
April-2016
spacer
January-2016
spacer
October-2015
spacer
August-2015
spacer
April-2015
spacer
February-2015
spacer
December-2014
spacer
3
Limited recourse borrowing arrangements - LRBAs

Transfer of loan amounts flagged as vital compliance step for LRBAs

       

 

With greater numbers of SMSFs turning to related-party loans after several banks withdrew from the SMSF lending space, a law firm has stressed the importance of ensuring that an actual transfer of money has taken place.

In an online article, Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers explained that, with borrowing options becoming more limited and SMSFs using related-party loans to fund property purchases, it’s vital that SMSF professionals and their clients are undertaking all the necessary compliance steps.

“When it comes to related-party borrowing, the importance of actually transferring the loan amount from the lender to the borrower, or to the vendor at the direction of the borrower, is sometimes overlooked, particularly in the circumstances where the same individual is the vendor, the lender and the fund trustee,” Townsends said.

The law firm cautioned that, if SMSFs are considering these types of transactions, just having formal loan documents noting the arm’s length loan terms may not be sufficient.

“The ATO’s current view is that there needs to be a transfer of money from the lender to the borrower as a necessary feature of a borrowing as referred to in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993,” it said.

“Journal entries or set-offs do not meet the requirements of a borrowing. The ATO has relied on old rulings in other contexts to distinguish loans from financial accommodation.”

The law firm gave an example of John, the sole member of an SMSF and sole director of the fund’s corporate trustee.

“After seeking financial and tax advice on the benefits of owning a property in his SMSF, John decides to sell his investment property valued at $1 million to his SMSF. As his SMSF’s available balance is $200,000 short of the market value, he will enter into a contract with the SMSF for a loan of $200,000 to fund its purchase using a limited recourse borrowing arrangement,” Townsends explained.

“In lieu of paying the loan amount to the SMSF, he received $800,000 as the vendor from the SMSF on settlement, the $1 million sale price less his ‘loan’ of $200,000 to the fund. But is that $200,000 really a loan?”

Townsends warned that, in this example, John should have actually transferred $200,000 from his personal account to the fund as an advance of the loan amount, and received the whole $1 million on the settlement of the property sale contract. 

“If the transaction is deemed to be an arrangement other than a loan, the LRBA exception under the SIS Act will not apply and this may expose the SMSF trustee to civil or criminal penalties and place the SMSF’s complying status at risk,” it said.

 

Miranda Brownlee
18 April 2019
SMSFadviser.com

 

site By PlannerWeb